Article from the National AAUP  (as of May 21, 2016)

Stand for academic freedom Henry Reichman, AAUP Foundation Communications

Dear Colleague,

I’m proud of the work the AAUP Foundation has done this year to support academic freedom. Thanks to supporters like you, we were able to fund scholarships to the AAUP/AAUP-CBC Summer Institute, the publication of the Journal of Academic Freedomand four investigations into alleged violations of academic freedom.

We also helped individual faculty members facing dismissal for reasons that implicated AAUP policies. Professor Robin Meade, who was summarily dismissed for writing a letter decrying her institution’s treatment of adjuncts, won reinstatement with support from the Foundation's Legal Defense Fund.  In response, she wrote “Thank you and everyone at AAUP for all your support, both emotional and financial. Until you came along I really thought I was by myself.”

Thank you for your support!

Henry Reichman
Chair, AAUP Foundation

 P.S. If you missed my newsletter earlier this fall, you can read more about our work here

Article as Posted December 13, 2015.

This article is noteworthy because the NU Administration and Board of Trustees did not include any NU Faculty members on the NU Presidential Search Committee.  The Faculty NU Presidential Search Committee appointed by the NU Senate on behalf of the NU Faculty were given four finalists which they were asked by the NU Administration to interview.  Based on the interview, the CV, and the candidate's letter of interest, the committee was asked to rank order the candidates which it did in a letter to the Chancellor on December 9.  Stay tuned,  The NUAAUP Chapter will comment on the candidate selected.

Dear AAUP Colleague: Today, the AAUP is releasing an investigative report on the University of Iowa’s 2015 presidential search.  The investigation found that the search was nothing less than a crude exercise of naked power by the Iowa Board of Regents. Notably, In contrast to historical practice at the university, which had been to involve faculty fully in presidential searches, the board designed this search process specifically to prevent any meaningful faculty role in the selection of the final candidate. The search was engineered by the board’s leadership from the outset to identify someone from the business world who fit with their image of “transformative leadership.” Once this person was identified, what followed was only an illusion of an open, honest search. J. Bruce Harreld was appointed as president above three finalists who were vastly more qualified and who enjoyed overwhelmingly more support from faculty and other campus constituencies. The board allowed prominent academic administrators from major higher education institutions to believe they were legitimate candidates in an open, honest search when the process in actuality was being manipulated to reach a foreordained result. In this, the governing board seriously disserved the people of Iowa as well as the institution to which it owes the highest standard of care. About our investigation and report, President J. Bruce Harreld said: “I believe the discovery process was professionally executed and find the report to be accurate from my perspective. . . . As I move forward as the president of the University of Iowa, please know I will continue to respect and engage in the shared governance of this institution, as I pledged to do before assuming my duties and as I have done so far in my first two weeks here.” Among other things, the investigating committee concluded: “We believe that the interests of faculty and the university are best served by taking President Harreld at his word while also being vigilant and prepared to act to maintain academic integrity and shared governance. Time will tell whether the new president will grow into the position and effectively defend the institution from the worst instincts of its governing board.” In June, the AAUP 2016 annual meeting may be asked to vote to add the University of Iowa to the list of institutions sanctioned for “substantial noncompliance with standards of academic government.” The list of sanctioned institutions is at http://www.aaup.org/our-work/shared-governance/sanctioned-institutions. The publication of these sanctions is for the purpose of informing Association members, the profession at large, and the public that unsatisfactory conditions of academic government exist at the institutions in question. You may read the whole report regarding the University of Iowa’s 2015 presidential search at http://www.aaup.org/report/Iowa. Regards,
Michael DeCesare, Chair
AAUP Committee on College and University Governance


The National University AAUP Advocacy Bylaws:http://www.aaup.org/our-work/shared-governance/sanctioned-institutions. The publication of these sanctions is for the purpose ofinforming Association members, the profession at large, and the public thatunsatisfactory conditions of academic government exist at the institutions inquestion.You may read the whole reportregarding the University of Iowa’s 2015 presidential search at http://www.aaup.org/report/Iowahttp://www.aaup.org/our-work/shared-governance/sanctioned-institutions. The publication of these sanctions is for the purpose ofinforming Association members, the profession at large, and the public thatunsatisfactory conditions of academic government exist at the institutions inquestion.You may read the whole reportregarding the University of Iowa’s 2015 presidential search at http://www.aaup.org/report/Iowahttp://www.aaup.org/our-work/shared-governance/sanctioned-institutions. The publication of these sanctions is for the purpose ofinforming Association members, the profession at large, and the public thatunsatisfactory conditions of academic government exist at the institutions inquestion.You may read the whole reportregarding the University of Iowa’s 2015 presidential search at http://www.aaup.org/report/Iowahttp://www.aaup.org/our-work/shared-governance/sanctioned-institutions. The publication of these sanctions is for the purpose ofinforming Association members, the profession at large, and the public thatunsatisfactory conditions of academic government exist at the institutions inquestion.You may read the whole reportregarding the University of Iowa’s 2015 presidential search at http://www.aaup.org/report/Iowahttp://www.aaup.org/our-work/shared-governance/sanctioned-institutions. The publication of these sanctions is for the purpose ofinforming Association members, the profession at large, and the public thatunsatisfactory conditions of academic government exist at the institutions inquestion.You may read the whole reportregarding the University of Iowa’s 2015 presidential search at http://www.aaup.org/report/Iowa

We recommend the following links:

American Association of University Professors (AAUP)   http://www.aaup.org/

Bulletin of the AAUP: http://www.aaup.org/issue/july-august-2015-bulletin

California AAUP  http://www.caaaup.org/

Insider Higher Ed  https://insiderhighered.com/

Other AAUP Chapter Sites

Whittier College, CA  http://wcaaup.org/

Redlands University, CA  https://sites.google.com/site/redlandsaaup/

Santa Clara University, CA  http://aaup-scu.org/resources.html

University of San Diego  http://aaup-usd.blogspot.com/

UCLA   http://ucla-faculty.org/

Central Connecticut State University  http://ccsu.csuaaup.org/